检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]甘肃政法学院公安技术学院,甘肃兰州730070
出 处:《辽宁警专学报》2013年第1期83-85,共3页Journal of Liaoning Police Academy
基 金:甘肃省财政厅2012年度高校基本科研业务费项目(甘财教[2012]129号)
摘 要:随着新《刑事诉讼法》的颁布实施,司法制度对证据提出了更高的要求,工具痕迹检验鉴定技术面临着严峻的挑战。有效利用工具痕迹,强化刑事科学技术能力,提高侦破效率,适应新形势同犯罪做斗争的需要。实践中工具痕迹利用率低的原因有多方面,本文从主观因素与客观因素两方面分析了工具痕迹利用率低的原因,根据实际状况,提出了侦查破案中提高工具痕迹利用率的途径与方法。With the promulgation and implementation of the new Criminal Procedure Law, judicial system has put forward higher requirements for evidence while the examination and identification technology of tool marks is facing more and more challenges. Only by utilizing tool marks effectively can intensify criminal science and technology abilities, improve the efficiency of investigating and solving cases and meet the requirements of fighting against crimes in the new situation. There are many reasons for the lower utilization rate of tool marks in practice. Therefore, this article put forward ways and methods of improving the utilization rate of tool marks in the work of investigating and solving cases according to this situation by analyzing the reasons of the relatively lower utilization rate from the aspects of subjective factors and objective factors.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.157