高校问责制中自治与外控的冲突及其化解策略  

Contradictions and Negotiations Between Autonomy and External Monitoring Within Universities' Accountability System

作　　者：操太圣[1] 

机构地区：[1]南京大学教育研究院,江苏南京210093

出　　处：《徐州工程学院学报（社会科学版）》2013年第1期104-108,共5页Journal of Xuzhou Institute of Technology：Social Sciences Edition

基　　金：中国高教学会重点课题"研究型大学基层学术领导与管理体制创新"(11ZD018);江苏省第四期"333工程"项目"世界一流大学体制创新与发展战略研究"的阶段成果

摘　　要：自治是高等学校弥足珍贵的传统或努力追求的价值,问责制则意味着某种形式的外部干预。存在必然张力的两种制度能否共冶一炉,是决策者和管理者必须思考和解决的问题。文章基于契约式自主的概念,讨论了高校问责的不同向度,强调从"贡献"和"过程"的绩效观出发,有助于平衡高校自治与外控的潜在冲突。Autonomy is among the most treasured traditions and value pursuits {or universities, where- as the accountability system means external monitoring. How can these two different systems be compati- ble？ It is a question needs solving for the policy-makers and administrators. Based on the concept of con- tractual autonomy, this paper discusses the different dimensions of accountability system, and emphasizes that it is useful to solve the hidden contradictions between autonomy and external monitoring if we make assessment from the ＂contribution ＂and ＂process＂ dimensions of performance.

关 键 词：问责制 自治 绩效考核 高校 

分 类 号：G47[文化科学—教育学]