检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:何云武[1] 龙慧[1] 邹聪[1] 李威[1] 李晴[1] 汤永红[1] 欧阳玲[1] 周丽娜[1]
机构地区:[1]南华大学附属第二医院疼痛科,湖南衡阳421001
出 处:《中南医学科学杂志》2013年第1期28-30,共3页Medical Science Journal of Central South China
基 金:湖南省教育厅项目(11C1105)资助;湖南省卫生厅项目(B2011-055)资助;衡阳市科技局项目(2011KS12)资助
摘 要:目的观察腰椎背根神经节脉冲射频术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床疗效。方法 48例腰椎间盘突出症患者回顾性分为常规治疗组(对照组)和背根神经节脉冲射频治疗组(治疗组),每组24例。分别在术前、术后1周、术后1月、术后3月对两组患者进行视觉模拟评分(VAS),并采用疼痛缓解评分评价疗效。结果与对照组比较,治疗组VAS评分明显下降;治疗组在术后1周、1月和3月的优良率明显高于对照组,差异均有显著性。结论腰椎背根神经节脉冲射频术治疗腰椎间盘突出症安全有效,值得临床推广。Objective To observe the clinical efficacy of lumbar dorsal root ganglion pulsed radiofrequency in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation. Methods 48 patients of lumbar disc herniation were randomly divided into the con- ventional treatment group (control group) and dorsal root ganglion pulsed radiofrequency treatment group (treatment group) according to random number table (n =24). The visual analogy score (VAS) was tested before operation, 1 week, 1 month and 3 months ',filer operation, and pain relief score was used to test the clinical efficacy after treatment. Results Com- pared with control group, the 'gAS scores decreased significantly in treatment group, and the excellent rates increased after 1 week, 1 month and 3 month. Conclusion The lumbar dorsal root ganglion pulsed radiofrequency in treatment of lumbar disc herniation was a safe and effective method, and it was worthy of promotion.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229