“诗”与“散文”的差异——胡风左翼文学批评的再认识(三)  

Differences between “Poetry”and “Prose”: Rethought of Hu Feng's Leftist Literary Criticism

作　　者：陈方竞[1] 朱旭晨[2] 

机构地区：[1]汕头大学文学院,广东汕头515063 [2]燕山大学文法学院,河北秦皇岛066004

出　　处：《南京晓庄学院学报》2013年第1期62-66,79,共6页Journal of Nanjing Xiaozhuang University

基　　金：国家社科基金项目"中国左翼文学研究"(05AZW002);广东省哲学社科"十一五"规划项目"鲁迅与中国现代文学批评"(07J02)的研究成果

摘　　要：胡风理论个性成就了他,也局限了他。他从"主观战斗精神"出发的文学批评立足的更是"诗",这与厨川白村《苦闷的象征》的影响相关,在"文艺的起源"上与厨川相接近的认识是更主要的根源,而与鲁迅对此的认识有明显差异。胡风主要立足于"诗"建立起的批评理论,对体现"叙述艺术"的鲁迅小说的认识与理解受到限制,这在客观上也限制了七月派诗歌叙事性的发展。Hu Feng's theory personality not only brings him success,but also limits him.His literary criticism from 'Subjective fighting spirit'is based on poetry.This was influenced by Kuriyagawa Hakuson's'the symbol of depression'.And a more important source is similar understanding of 'the origin of literature art'with Kuriyagawa which is obviously different from Lu Xun.The critical theory based on poetry had limited Hu Feng's understanding of Lu Xun's novels which embody 'descriptive art',and limited the development of July Poetry's narrative features in reality.

关 键 词：胡风 差异 批评理论 

分 类 号：I207.2[文学—中国文学]