论著作权法保护工业设计图的界限——以英国《版权法》的变迁为视角  

Study on the Borderline of the Protection of Industrial Design Drawings in Copyright Law

作　　者：王迁[1] 

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学

出　　处：《知识产权》2013年第1期19-33,共15页Intellectual Property

基　　金：作者主持的教育部人文社科研究项目"实用品设计著作权与外观设计专利权交叉保护研究"(项目批准号:09YJC820031)的初期成果

摘　　要：英国在1956年《版权法》中不适当地扩大了对工业设计图的保护范围,除了可适用"非专家抗辩"的情形,未经许可根据工业设计图制造工业产品,以及仿造由此制成的工业品均构成版权侵权,实际上使打印机墨盒等大量工业品受到版权保护,导致了法律逻辑的混乱。这一问题直至1988年英国重新制订《版权法》时才得以解决。工业设计图能作为作品受著作权法保护的依据,并非其艺术吸引力,而在于其是由点、线、面和各种几何结构组合而成的,包含着严谨、精确、简洁、和谐与对称的"科学之美"。以"平面到平面"方式复制工业设计图是单纯再现工业设计图科学美感的过程,应获得著作权人的许可。但基于著作权法不保护实用功能的基本原理,根据工业设计图建造工程或制造工业品的行为只是实现其中技术功能的过程,著作权法不应予以禁止。The 1956 Copyright Law of UK appropriately extended the scope of protection for the industrial design drawings, in which the manufacture based on the industrial design drawings and the copy of the production made by the industrial design drawings could be deemed as infringement actions, except the situation in which the ＂non-expert defense＂ could be applied. This protection actually made the printer cartridges protected by copyright law, and caused chaos of legal logic, which was finally solved until the Copyright Law of UK was revised in 1988. What is protected by copyright law in industrial design drawing is the rigorous, precise, concise, harmonious and symmetrical ＂scientific beauty＂ comprised by point, line, plane and various geometric constructions, not its artistic attraction. The plane-to-plane copy of the industrial design drawings completely represents the scientific beauty, so it should be granted by the copyright owner. Because of the basic theory that copyright law does not protect the utility function, the construction of buildings and the manufacture of product according to the design should not be prohibited by copyright law, as these actions are just the process of realizing the technical function.

关 键 词：工业设计图 产品设计图 工程设计图 平面到平面的复制 平面到立体的复制 

分 类 号：D956.1[政治法律—法学] D923.41