浅谈“保护的责任”与国际法若干基本原则的关系  

Comments on the Relationship between the Responsibility to Protect and Fundamental Principles of Public International Law

作　　者：朱奕锋[1] 

机构地区：[1]中山大学法学院,广东广州510006

出　　处：《中山大学研究生学刊（社会科学版）》2012年第3期66-75,共10页Journal of the Graduates Sun YAT-SEN University(Social Sciences)

摘　　要：本文在简要介绍了"保护的责任"的发展历程,并着重以《2005年世界首脑会议成果》为对象讨论"保护的责任"与国家主权平等原则、不干涉内政原则和禁止使用武力原则等国际法基本原则的关系,认为国家主权平等原则的内涵得到一定修改,但作为责任的主权仅在灭绝种族、战争罪,族裔清洗和危害人类罪这四种情况下得到确认。就不干涉内政原则和禁止使用武力原则而言,《2005年世界首脑会议成果》将国际社会的责任限定在《联合国宪章》的框架下,强调了联合国安理会的主导作用,因而并未受到太大冲击。This article first introduces the development of the concept of the Responsibility to Protect and discusses on 2005 World Summit Outcome the relationship between this concept and several important principles of public international law like state sovereignty and equality, non-intervention in domestic affairs and the prohibition of the use of force. It follows that the content of the principle of state sovereignty has been reconceptualised, though the change is confined to genocide, war crime, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity only. As to the other two principles, 2005 World Summit Outcome still places the responsibility under the framework of U. N. Charter and emphasises the leading role played by Security Council, thus leaving them almost intact.

关 键 词：保护的责任 国家主权平等原则 不干涉内政原则 禁止使用武力原则 

分 类 号：D990[政治法律—国际法学]