检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]重庆大学经济与工商管理学院,重庆400044 [2]重庆大学公共管理学院,重庆400044
出 处:《南京农业大学学报(社会科学版)》2013年第1期103-112,共10页Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Sciences Edition)
摘 要:基于ACT(2001)贸易环境效应模型,采用面板数据SUR估计,对2000—2010年中国省级单位各经济要素的贸易环境效应、不同相对收入地区的贸易环境效应以及不同相对收入情况下由贸易引致的规模、结构、技术和贸易强度对污染物排放量进行了弹性分析。结果显示:中国现行经济规模、经济结构导致了环境质量的恶化,技术的正效应超过结构的负效应,贸易自由化直接促进了环境水平的提高;不同收入水平地区的贸易弹性存在较大差异;贸易对收入较低地区的环境影响程度较大,收入较高地区的贸易开放度与环境污染相关程度较低。Based on ACT(2001 ) trade-environment effect model, this paper uses SUR estimation of panel data and the data of provincial units of China from 2000--2010, and empirically analyzes the trade-environmental effects of different economic factors, the trade-environmental effects of different relative income areas and the e- lasticity of scale, structure, technology and trade intensity on the emission of pollutants caused by the trade un- der the situation of different relative income areas. The result shows that China' s economic scale and economic composition leads to the deterioration of the environment, that the positive technology effect exceeds the composi- tion effect, that the trade liberalization promotes the environmental quality directly, that the trade elasticity of dif- ferent relative income areas varies considerably, that trade affects the environment of low- income areas greatly, and that the trade liberalization of high-income areas has almost nothing to do with environmental pollution.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.124