“哈特-富勒”论战的回顾与反思——文化进化背景中的法律与道德关系  

Review and Reflection of Hart-Fuller Debate:The Relationship Between Law and Morality under the Background of Cultural Evolution

作　　者：刘春兴[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京林业大学生物学博士后流动站,北京100083

出　　处：《嘉兴学院学报》2013年第1期102-107,共6页Journal of Jiaxing University

基　　金：中国博士后科学基金项目(2011M500248)

摘　　要：20世纪50年代的"哈特-富勒"论战堪称法学史上的一座里程碑,在国内外法学界引发了大量回应性文献,但迄今人们仍未能就其主题——法律与道德的关系取得共识。进化生物学既研究有机体进化也研究文化进化,而法律与道德均属文化现象,因而可采用进化生物学方法予以研究。通过静态与动态的二元区分,在更广阔的文化进化大背景之中重新审视两者之间的关系,将会发现,在静态上法律与道德并无必然的联系,但在动态上法律的演化仍然要服从某种更高的进化法则,由此,在进化生物学的视野中获得关于"哈特-富勒"论战的全新理解。The Hart-Fuller Debate which occurred in the 1950s can be called a milestone in the history of jurisprudence and has aroused a huge number of responsive literatures in legal cireles both at home and abroad. However, there has not hitherto a consensus on its theme- -the relationship between law and morality. Evolutionary biology studies both organic evolution and cultural evolution, and law and morality are cultural phenomena, which makes it possible to introduce an evolutionary paradigm to study them. When we observe the relationship between law and morality under a broader background of cultural evolution, we find that there are not necessary relationship between law and morality statically, that the evolution of law should still follow a higher principle of evolution dynamically, and that we get a new appreciation of the Hart-Fuller Debate in the perspective of evolutionary biology.

关 键 词：哈特 富勒 法律 道德 文化进化 进化生物学 达尔文 

分 类 号：D90[政治法律—法学理论]