检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]河南中医学院医院,郑州450003 [2]河南省职工医学院 [3]河南省胸科医院
出 处:《中医正骨》2000年第6期14-14,共1页The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology
摘 要:为了观察针刀疗法与颈椎牵引对颈椎病治疗的临床效果。选用了诊断明确的 12 6例颈椎病患者 ,随机分为治疗组 96例 ,以针刀治疗 ;对照组 30例 ,以颈椎牵引治疗。两组同时配合服用中药。结果治疗组治愈 86例 (89.6 % ) ,总有效率 96 .9% ;对照组治愈17例 (5 6 .7% ) ,总有效率 83.3%。治疗组治愈率和总有效率明显优于对照组 (P<0 .0 5 )。表明对颈椎病的治疗 ,针刀疗法优于颈椎牵引。In order to observe the therapeutic effects of small scalpel therapy (SST) and cervical vertebral traction (CVT) on cervical spondylopathy, 126 patients with confirmedly diagnosed cervical spondylopathy were selected and randomly divided into the treated group (n=96 cases ) and the control group (n=30 cases), which were treated by SST and CVT, respectively. Both groups took traditional Chinese drugs as the auxiliary means besides. The results showed that 86 cases (89.6 %) were cured and the total effective rate reached 96.9 % in the treated group; while 17 cases (56.7 %) were cured and the total effective rate reached 83.3 % in the control. The cured and total effective rates of the treated group had a significant advantage over those of the control group (P < 0.05), suggesting that SST had advantage over CVT in the treatment of cervical spondylopathy.
分 类 号:R274[医药卫生—中医骨伤科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.167