平等的资源主义分析路径的内在张力--罗纳德·德沃金的化解及其困境  

The Tension of Resourcism Approach of Equality——Ronald Dworkin's Settlement and Its Plight

作　　者：高景柱[1,2,3] 

机构地区：[1]天津师范大学政治学博士后流动站 [2]天津师范大学政治文化与政治文明建设研究院 [3]天津师范大学政治与行政学院

出　　处：《政治思想史》2012年第4期139-155,199,共17页Journal of the History of Political Thought

基　　金：天津市哲学社会科学规划项目(项目编号:TJZZ11-031);天津市高等学校人文科学研究重点项目(项目编号:2010ZD04)

摘　　要：平等的资源主义分析路径是当代政治哲学中的平等理论的一种重要分析进路,罗纳德.德沃金所建构的名为"资源平等"的分配正义理论是其中的代表性理论之一。资源平等的理论目标是"敏于抱负"和"钝于禀赋",实际上,这两种理论目标之间有一种内在的张力,"敏于抱负"与"钝于禀赋"相互消解。德沃金在一定程度上意识到了其平等的资源主义分析路径的内在张力,并试图以"虚拟保险市场"来化解它。德沃金的这一尝试是值得商榷的,原因主要在于虚拟保险市场既不能实现"敏于抱负",又不能实现"钝于禀赋"。Resourcism approach of Equality is an important approach to the theory of equality in contemporary political philosophy,and Ronald Dworkin's equality of resources is one of the representative theories.The target of equality of resources is 'ambition-sensitive' and 'endowment-insensitive'.In fact,there is a tension between 'ambition-sensitive' and 'endowment-insensitive',that is to say,'ambition-sensitive' and 'endowment-insensitive' eliminate mutually.Ronald Dworkin partly recognizes that there is a conflict between 'ambition-sensitive' and 'endowment-insensitive',and he tries to solve it by the hypothetical insurance market.Ronald Dworkin doesn't successfully solve the tension,because the hypothetical insurance market can't realize 'ambition-sensitive' and 'endowment-insensitive'.

关 键 词：平等 资源平等 虚拟保险市场 罗纳德·德沃金 

分 类 号：D0[政治法律—政治学]