笔记野史对古代文学研究的价值管窥——从袁编《文学史》对笔记野史类著作的征引说起  

The Use of Literatus’ Sketches and Unofficial History Books in Yuan’s Compiling Work History of Literature

作　　者：王金伟[1] 

机构地区：[1]广西师范学院文学院,广西南宁530001

出　　处：《昆明冶金高等专科学校学报》2012年第6期87-90,共4页Journal of Kunming Metallurgy College

摘　　要：笔记与野史是两种既有区别又有联系的文献类型,其不同主要在于文史有异,而相似性则在于内容杂糅、组排形式随意以及撰述角度的兼容,故两者"分"与"合"应参考量的因素依情况而定。相关的研究重视对当时代和有影响的笔记野史类著作的使用。笔记野史之于古代文学研究有反映文学事实、对学术概念与学说正源清流及"粗线勾勒"作家形象等方面的价值。Literatus＇ sketches and unofficial history books are two different but related types of docu- ments. The former is literature work, and the latter is history. But they have something in common in terms of mixed contents, random form and being compatible in writing. Therefore, separation and combi- nation of the two in a work should be dealt with accordingly, and the quantity to use should be consid- ered. Relevant researches quote more works of literatus＇ sketches and unofficial history books since they are valuable in reflecting the reality, clearing academic concepts and describing the images of ancient lit- eratus roughly.

关 键 词：笔记 野史 古代文学研究 袁编《文学史》 

分 类 号：I206.2[文学—中国文学]