中日钓鱼岛之争中的有效统治证据分量考  

An Analysis of Effectiveness of the Effective Administration in the Diaoyu Islands Dispute between China and Japan

作　　者：张卫彬[1] 

机构地区：[1]安徽财经大学,安徽蚌埠233030

出　　处：《太平洋学报》2012年第12期60-67,共8页Pacific Journal

基　　金：教育部人文社科规划青年基金项目"国际法院解决领土争端中的证据问题研究"(11YJC820169);中国海洋发展研究中心重点项目"我国应对海洋权益突出问题的策略研究"(AOCZD201202);中国太平洋学会重大项目"东;南中国诸岛中有海争议岛屿的史地考证及相关问题研究"(2200214)的阶段性研究成果

摘　　要：有效统治作为一国对争议区域行使主权活动的行为,已经引起越来越多国家的重视。但是,有效统治并非一种法律权利,当有效统治行为与体现权原的权利发生冲突时,后者处于优先的地位;而且,有效的国际条约具有决定性分量。同样,中日钓鱼岛列岛争端中所涉及的相关条约应具有优先性。但是,不应忽视历史证据,尤其是有效统治证据的分量。为了巩固我国对钓鱼岛列岛享有的历史主权,必须采取各种有效统治措施,进一步彰显主权。Effective administration taken as a behavior to effectively exercise sovereign jurisdiction, has been at- tached great importance to its weight by more and more countries. However, the effective administration is by no means a legal right, when effective administration behavior clashes with the right embodying the source right the latter prevails. Moreover, the effective international treaties prevails over any other written evidence, being deci- sively weighty. At the same time, treaties involved Diaoyu Islands dispute between China and Japan should pre- vails over any other written evidence. Nevertheless, we should not neglect weight of historic evidence , especially the weight of evidence of effective administration. In order to consolidate the historical sovereignty of Diaoyu Islands, China should adopt various measures of effective administration to further highlight China＇ s sovereignty.

关 键 词：有效统治 钓鱼岛列岛 证据分量 

分 类 号：DF931[政治法律—国际法学]