检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《中医临床研究》2012年第23期4-6,共3页Clinical Journal Of Chinese Medicine
基 金:广东省中医药局科研课题(NO.2008067)
摘 要:目的:BODE评分对清肺解毒化痰法对COPD急性加重期的临床评价。方法:将符合诊断标准的COPD加重期患者91例分为两组:中药组47例和常规组44例,常规组规范化治疗方案,中药组在其基础上加清肺解毒化痰方,疗程为8周。通过治疗前后对患者AECOPD缓解时间、住院持续时间和BODE评分进行评价。结果:中药组AECOPD缓解时间、AECOPD住院时间和BODE评分明显优于常规组,差异有显著性意义(P<0.05);中药组BODE评分前后对比,差异有显著性意义(P<0.05),而常规组差异性不大。结论:清肺解毒化痰法对COPD急性加重期的治疗有较好作用。Objective: To apply BODE scores to evaluate the effect of Qingfei Jiedu Huatan formula in acute exacerbation period of COPD. Methods: 91 patients which was consistent with the diagnostic criteria of COPD were randomly divided into 2. groups, 47 cases in the TCM group and 44 cases in the routine group. The routine group was given standardized treatment, while Qingfei Jiedu Huatan formula was given to the TCM group on the basis of standardized treatment. The treatment lasted for 8 weeks. The AECOPD relieving time, persistence time in hospital and BODE scores were evaluated. Results: The AECOPD relieving time, persistence time in hospital and BODE scores of the TCM treated group were significantly better than those of the routine group (P〈0.05). The BODE scores of TCM treated group before and after treatment were significantly different (P〈0.05), while there was no significantly difference in the routine group. Conclusion: Qingfei Jiedu Huatan formula had reasonable effect in acute exacerbation period of COPD.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.42