检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《昆明医科大学学报》2012年第12期107-109,共3页Journal of Kunming Medical University
摘 要:目的探讨微量间歇性超声雾化吸入治疗小儿支气管肺炎效果及总结相关护理体会.方法将支气管肺炎患儿124例,按照随机数字法分为观察组和对照组,每组各62例.2组患儿均接受常规抗感染治疗,在此基础上对照组给予传统超声雾化吸入治疗,观察组给予微量间歇性超声雾化吸入疗法,2组患儿在超声雾化吸入治疗后均接受物理护理干预.观察并比较两组患儿雾化吸入前后的呼吸、心率血氧饱和度变化、有效排痰时间、临床症状改善及不良反应情况.结果治疗后观察组在呼吸频率、血氧饱和度、有效排痰时、退烧和啰音消失时间均显著好于对照组(P<0.05),且住院时间为(10.8±2.3)d,总有效率达95.2%,均显著好于对照组(P<0.05).结论微量间歇性超声雾化吸入治疗及合理的护理策略能够有效加速支气管肺炎患儿临床症状的改善,提高治疗总有效率.Objective To investigate the clinical effect and nursing experience of micro and intermittent ul- trasound atomization inhalation in treating children with bronchial pneumonia. Methods 124 patients with bronchial pneumonia were divided into 2 groups randomly, all the children were given common treatment and physi- cal nursing intervention, children in control group were given traditional ultrasound atomization inhalation, and oth- ers in observation group were given micro and intermittent ultrasound atomization inhalation, the clinical effect was compared. Results After treatment, the total efficiency and hospital time of observation group was 95.2% and (10.8 ± 2.3) d, significantly better than control group, and also the clinical symptom improvement (P〈 0.05) Conclusion Micro and intermittent ultrasound atomization inhalation and rational nursing measures can promote the recovery of clinical symptoms and increase the total efficiency.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.40