检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]浙江理工大学经济与管理学院,浙江杭州310018
出 处:《中国科技论坛》2013年第2期10-14,共5页Forum on Science and Technology in China
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目--"中国技术创新政策演变;测量与绩效--基于政策工具的研究"(70973144);教育部人文社科规划项目--"企业R&D投入;技术能力与产出绩效"(10YJA630078);浙江省自然科学基金--"企业R&D投入;技术能力与产出绩效"(Y7100462)
摘 要:本文以企业创新能力为中介变量,研究创新政策对企业绩效影响。基于浙江企业的调查数据研究,发现供给政策和环境政策对产品创新能力、工艺创新能力有促进作用,需求政策对创新能力不显著。不同创新能力对企业绩效影响存在差异:产品创新能力对财务绩效和市场绩效有促进作用,工艺创新能力对财务绩效有促进作用。企业创新能力在创新政策与企业绩效间起完全中介作用。企业规模对政策绩效有影响,产品创新能力对企业绩效的影响随着规模扩大而提高,中小企业工艺创新能力对企业绩效有显著影响。The paper studied the effect of China's innovation policy on firm performance, using enterprises' innovation capability as mediating variables. Based on survey data of enterprises in Zhejiang, the study found that: supply and environment instruments had positive effect on product and process innovation capability; demand instruments had no significant effect. Different innovation capability had different effect on firm performance. Product innovation capability had positive effect on financial and market performance. Process innovation capability had positive effect on financial performance. Innovation capability of firm had full mediating role between innovation policy and performance. Scale of firm had effect on innovation policy performance. The effect of product innovation capability on perform- ance increased with scale. SMEs process innovation capability had significance effect on firm performance; large enterprises had no sig- nificant effect.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7