海峡两岸专利标识比较分析  

Comparative Analysis on Patent Identification of Both Sides of the Taiwan Straits

作　　者：曹新明[1] 

机构地区：[1]中南财经政法大学知识产权研究中心,湖北武汉430073

出　　处：《南昌大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2013年第1期81-85,共5页Journal of Nanchang University(Humanities and Social Sciences)

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目"与对外贸易有关的知识产权政策研究"(10JJD820014)

摘　　要：专利标记或者专利号是专利权人标注在专利产品或者该产品包装上,以表明该产品是专利产品或者依据专利方法直接获得的产品的特定标识。海峡两岸的专利法关于专利权人标注专利标记或者专利号的定性具有明显不同:大陆地区专利法将此作为权利对待,台湾地区则将其作为义务规定。在《海峡两岸知识产权保护合作协议》签订并生效以后,海峡两岸同胞或者企业必定需要通过对方管道来寻求知识产权保护,包括专利保护。通过比较海峡两岸专利法在专利标记属性、专利标识作用及其效果方面的差异,可以看出,最有效的专利标记标注模式应是大陆专利法与台湾地区专利法关于标注专利标记的结合模式。Patent identification is a special identification that a patentee often uses it on his product to indicate that it＇s his patent product.As for the patent identification,the patent law of both sides of the Taiwan Straits is very different： one treats it as the patentees＇ rights,while the other treats it as the patentees＇ duty.After ＂The Protection of Intellectual Property Rights Cooperation Agreement on Both Sides of the Straits＂ has been signed,the people and the companies should be protected under the patent law of the opposite side.Through the comparative analysis on the nature,the function and the effect of patent identification,maybe the proper model of patent identification is the combination of both sides of the Taiwan Straits.

关 键 词：专利标识 属性 损害赔偿 

分 类 号：D923.4[政治法律—民商法学]