检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孙玉芸[1,2]
机构地区:[1]南昌大学立法研究中心,江西南昌330047 [2]南昌大学法学院,江西南昌330031
出 处:《南昌大学学报(人文社会科学版)》2013年第1期86-90,共5页Journal of Nanchang University(Humanities and Social Sciences)
基 金:江西省社会科学"十一五"规划项目"演绎作品著作权保护研究"(10FX35)
摘 要:原创性是演绎作品受版权法保护的核心要件。为判断演绎作品的原创性,法院发展出"超过微小变化"标准和"两分法"标准。由于演绎权是作者创作演绎作品或授权他人创作演绎作品的权利,因此,演绎作品的原创性标准,不可避免地会影响到演绎权的侵权认定。司法实践中,法院应要求非法演绎作品具有原创性,才构成对作者演绎权的侵犯。就作者演绎权而言,演绎作品的原创性是一把双刃剑:一方面,"两分法"标准使演绎作者的版权依附于原作者的演绎权;另一方面,"超过微小变化"标准又将创作"微小变化"作品的行为排除在侵权之外。Originality is the core qualification for the derivative work to be protected by copyright act.There are two standards for the courts to determine whether a derivative work has originality:one is the standard of "more than merely trivial changes",and the other is the standard of "dichotomy method".Derivative rights is an important property right,which means the author can translate or adapt his work and forbid others from translating or adapting his work.So,the originality of derivative work will inevitably influence the infringement of derivative right.If a work does not have originality,then even it is illegal,courts should not find it infringe the author's derivative rights.As far as the author's derivative rights is concerned,the originality of derivative work is a double-edged sword: for one thing,the standard of "dichotomy method" makes the subsequent author's copyright depend on the original author's derivative rights;for another,the standard of "more than merely trivial changes" excludes the creation of merely trivial changes out of infringement.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28