检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《中国新药杂志》2013年第2期138-140,共3页Chinese Journal of New Drugs
摘 要:目的:介绍并分析社会意愿支付法的基本理论,为我国成本效果阈值的确定提供一定的方法论基础。方法:总结社会意愿支付法的优缺点,并与我国实际情况相结合,明确其对我国成本效果阈值确定的借鉴意义。结果:社会意愿支付法有体现民众意愿、随经济发展水平变化等优点、同时在理论角度、实践角度、制度角度以及方法本身角度等方面均存在一定的争议。结论:社会意愿支付法是最常用的成本效果阈值确定方法之一,在理论与实践等方面均有着独特的优势,运用该方法将会对我国的成本效果阈值科学确定起到积极的推进作用。Objective: To introduce and analyze the basic theory of social willing-to-pay method, as a methodology basis for determining cost-effectiveness thresholds in China. Methods: The advantage and disadvan- tage of social willing-to-pay method were summarized, and combined with Chinese concrete circumstance the mean- ing for determination of cost-effectiveness thresholds in China was clarified. Results: Social willing-to-pay method incarnated the public willing, and had the advantages flexible with the level of economic development. At the same time there were also some disputes in theory, practice, system, and methodology. Conclusions: Social willing-to- pay method is the most common determining method of cost-effectiveness thresholds; it has unique advantages in theory and practice. The application of this method will exert positive effects in the determination of cost-effective- ness thresholds.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117