检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周惠玲
出 处:《齐鲁护理杂志》2013年第1期23-24,共2页Journal of Qilu Nursing
摘 要:目的:探讨护理干预对单纯糖筛查异常孕妇妊娠结局的影响。方法:将158例单纯糖筛查异常孕妇随机分为干预组80例和对照组78例。对照组孕妇采用常规产前检查,干预组孕妇在此基础上进行护理干预。观察比较两组孕妇的妊娠结局。结果:干预组剖宫产、胎内窘迫、羊水过多、胎膜早破等并发症发生率及巨大儿发生率与对照组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),妊娠期高血压疾病、新生儿窒息及早产儿发生率与对照组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:对单纯糖筛查异常的孕妇进行护理干预可取得良好的妊娠结局,值得临床推广。Objective :To explore the effect of nursing intervention on the pregnant outcomes of pregnant women with abnormality in glu- cose challenge test. Methods:158 pregnant women with abnormality in glucose challenge test were randomly divided into an intervention group (n = 80 ) and a control group( n = 78). The pregnant women were given routine antenatal screening in the control group and extra nursing intervention was given to the pregnant women in the intervention group based on routine antenatal examination. The outcomes of pregnancy were observed and compared between the two groups. Results:There were statistically significant differences in the comparison of the incidence of cesarean section, fetal distress, polyhydramnios, premature rupture of membranes and other complications and the incidence of macrosomia between the two groups ( P 〈 0.05 ) ; there were no statistically significant differences in the comparison of the incidence of gestational hypertension, neonatal asphyxia and preterm birth between the two groups ( P 〉 0. 05 ). Conclusion : The nursing intervention on pregnant women with abnormality in glucose challenge test can achieve good outcomes of pregnancy.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.221.207.166