检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]广西壮族自治区桂平市人民医院供应室,广西桂平537200
出 处:《中国当代医药》2013年第2期163-164,共2页China Modern Medicine
摘 要:目的分析并研究供应室无菌间护士使用两种不同洗手消毒方法的效果。方法随机将供应室无菌间20名护士分为两组,每组均为10名,分别使用固体肥皂洗手法和抗菌消毒液擦拭洗手法,洗手前后进行手部细菌培养。结果使用固体肥皂洗手法后手部细菌清除率为80%,使用抗菌消毒液擦拭洗手法后手部细菌清除率为95%,两者比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论抗菌消毒液擦拭洗手法较固体肥皂洗手法灭菌效果更好,且方便易进行,有效率明显优于后者。Objective To analyze and research effects of different hands disinfection methods applied to workers in supply room. Methods Twenty workers in supply room were divided into two groups, 10 workers for one group. Solid soap handwashing method and wipe handwashing with antimicrobial disinfectant were used respectively. Hands bacterial culture was made before and after handwashing. Results The bacterial clearance was 80% by using solid soap handwashing method. And the bacterial clearance was 95% by using wipe handwashing with antimicrobial disinfectant. Both of them had the statistical significance. Conclusion Wipe handwashing with antimicrobial disinfectant has better effect than solid soap handwashing method. The former is easy to do and its efficiency is obviously better than the latter.
分 类 号:R197.323[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145