德湿舒治疗压疮与两种传统方法的比较  

comparison of the de shi shu treatment of pressure ulcers with the two traditional methods

作　　者：孙娟[1] 胡静[1] 赵天霞[1] 

机构地区：[1]德阳市人民医院呼吸内科,四川德阳618000

出　　处：《中国民康医学》2013年第1期126-127,共2页Medical Journal of Chinese People’s Health

摘　　要：目的:比较德湿舒与两种传统方法治疗压疮的临床效果。方法:将我科室出现压疮的患者72例91处,随机分为A组(德湿舒组),B组(吹氧法组)和C组(雷佛组),观察各组压疮的治愈率和好转率。结果:A组(德湿舒组)和B组(吹氧法组)治愈率和有效率明显高于C组(雷佛组),差异有显著性。结论:德湿舒水凝胶伤口敷料对压疮的治疗效果满意,操作方便,值得临床大力推广。Objective：To compare De shi shu with the two traditional methods of treatment of pressure sores clinical effects. Methods ： In my department ,72 cases of patients with pressure sores of 91, were randomly divided into group A （ De shi shu group） , B group （oxygen blowing method group） and group C （Ethacridine Lactate group） ; observed each group pressure sores cure rate and improvement rate. Results： Group A （ De shi shu group ） and group B （ oxygen blowing method group） cure rate and efficiency was significantly higher than that of group C （ Ray Buddhist group）, there are significant differences. Conclusions ： De shi shu hydrogel wound dressing on the satisfaction of the therapeutic effect of pressure ulcers, easy to operate, worthy of clinical vigorously promoted.

关 键 词：水凝胶伤口敷料 压疮 护理 

分 类 号：R473.5[医药卫生—护理学]