西方城市规划评估的研究述评  

A Review of Urban Planning Evaluation in the West

作　　者：周珂慧[1] 姜劲松[1] 

机构地区：[1]江苏省城市规划设计研究院苏州分院

出　　处：《城市规划学刊》2013年第1期104-109,共6页Urban Planning Forum

摘　　要：对近30年来西方城市规划评估文献进行回顾和梳理,从方法论的角度归纳如下:评估标准从遵循"严格线性",到允许存在"规划偏移"(基于目标结果有益的前提);评估类型从"蓝图式方案评估"、"实施过程评估"到"规划绩效评估",呈现"方案-过程-效果"的演进趋势;评估方法从"理性评估"到"交互运用",强调定性、定量方法的多元融合。评估时应考虑已编制规划本身的科学性和决策的公共引导性,同时建构评估的综合性解释机制,以强化理论研究的实践指导作用、This paper reviews literature on urban planning evaluation published in the past 30 years. It is found that evaluation criteria has shifted from strict lin- ear conformance to allowed deviation （premised on minimum beneficial outcome）, the subject matter for evaluation has evolved from blueprint to implementation to performance outcome, and the methodology has shifted from relying on technical rationality to the integration of qualitative and quantitative measures..In the end, this paper concludes that planning evaluation should take into consideration of the rationality of the plan and the plan making process and base judgment on a com- prehensive indicator system that combines theories with practice.

关 键 词：西方规划界 规划评估 述评 

分 类 号：TU984[建筑科学—城市规划与设计]