重审建国后《女神》的文学史书写方式  

Re-Examining the Writing Way of Literature History about Goddess after the Founding of PRC

作　　者：彭冠龙[1] 

机构地区：[1]贵州师范大学文学院,贵州贵阳550001

出　　处：《西安石油大学学报（社会科学版）》2013年第1期82-88,共7页Journal of Xi’an Shiyou University:Social Science Edition

基　　金：四川省教育厅社会科学重点研究课题(GY12A06)

摘　　要：从文学史书的目录和正文中可以看出,建国后《女神》的文学史书写方式经历了两个发展阶段,即不重视介绍《女神》文本、政治话语强盛的时期和立足于文本、摆脱意识形态色彩的时期。这两个时期的发展中存在着三个主要问题,即对《女神》版本差异的忽视、对大量作品的忽视、对《女神》"五四"时代精神的过度强调。这些问题对《女神》的文学史形象造成了一定的扭曲,威胁到文学史的研究和教学,因此必须予以指出并清理。From the table of contents and the main text, it can be seen that the writing way of literature history about Goddess after the founding of P RC went through two stages ： in the first stage, authors ignored the text and emphasized political words; in the second stage, authors paid much attention to the text and broke a- way from ideological feature. There existed three main problems in the development of two stages, including the ignorance of version differences about Goddess, the neglect of a large number of works, and the over - emphasis on the time spirit of May Fourth Movement about Goddess. These problems twisted the image of literature histo- ry about Goddess to some degree, and threatened the research and teaching of literature history. Therefore,it is necessary to point out them and settle them.

关 键 词：郭沫若 《女神》 文学史 书写方式 版本差异 过度强调 

分 类 号：I207[文学—中国文学]