检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《法学杂志》2013年第2期31-39,共9页Law Science Magazine
摘 要:欧盟关于保险合同法律适用规则的《罗马条例Ⅰ》第7条自面世以来一直受到学界的关注,它因错综复杂而受到褒贬不一的评价。本文认为其选法格局宏观上是依保单持有人是否需要特别保护为考虑因素,将保险合同重新分为两大类;微观上分别对再保险合同、大规模风险保险合同、大众风险保险合同以及强制保险合同进行考量,并重点分析了承保大众风险合同法律选择规则的若干问题,如意思自治原则、最密切联系原则以及欧盟成员国的具体情况,最后对我国的相关立法提出完善建议。The academic circles have been paying close attention to the Article 7 of "Rome I " which concerns the applicable law to the insurance contracts in European Union since it was enacted in 2008. The Article 7 is affirmed or negated by different scholars because of its compli-ation. This paper finds that the general model of choice - of - law for insurance contracts is to re -classify the insurance contracts into two categories based on the consideration, which is whether policy holders need special protection, and that the particular rules for reinsurance contracts, large risks insurance contracts, mass risks insurance contracts and compulsory insurance con- tracts. This paper focuses on some issues of choice - of- law for mass risks insurance contracts, such as the principle of party autonomy, closest connection and the specific situations of member states of the European Union. Finally, this paper gives some suggestions to perfect the related legislation for China.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30