检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]四川省中医药科学院中医研究所皮肤科,成都610031 [2]四川省中医药科学院
出 处:《中国针灸》2013年第2期121-124,共4页Chinese Acupuncture & Moxibustion
摘 要:目的:比较火针联合窄谱中波紫外线(NB-UVB)与单纯NB-UVB治疗白癜风的临床疗效差异。方法:将93例患者随机分为观察组(48例)、对照组(45例)。观察组给予火针联合NB-UVB照射局部,火针点刺阿是穴(皮损局部)及足三里;对照组单用NB-UVB照射局部,治疗12周后判断疗效。结果:观察组愈显率为79.2%(38/48),优于对照组的48.9%(22/45,P<0.05)。结论:火针联合NB-UVB治疗白癜风较单纯运用NB-UVB疗效显著。Objective To compare clinical efficacy difference between fire needle combined with narrow band ultraviolet-B (NB-UVB) and NB-UVB therapy for vitiligo. Methods Ninety-three cases of vitiligo were randomly divided into an observation group (n=48) and a control group (n=45). In the observation group, fire needle was applied to ashi points around the damaged skin and Zusanli (ST 36), meanwhile NB-UVB therapy irradiating the local area. The control group was treated by NB-UVB therapy. The clinical efficacy was evaluated after the treat- ment of 12 weeks. Results The total effective rate was 79.2% (38/48) in the observation group, which was su- perior to that 48.9% (22/45, P〈0.05) in the control group. Conclusion The fire needle combined with NB- UVB for vililigo achieves a more obvious efficacy than NB-UVB therapy.
分 类 号:R246.7[医药卫生—针灸推拿学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3