机构地区:[1]山东省青岛疗养院人力资源部,266071 [2]山东省青岛疗养院护理部,266071 [3]山东省青岛疗养院病区,266071
出 处:《中华现代护理杂志》2012年第35期4217-4222,共6页Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing
基 金:山东省卫生厅基金资助项目(2007HW132)
摘 要:目的探讨综合干预、定期随访对健康体检中诊断为原发性高血压患者的高血压知晓率、治疗率、控制率及其并发症发生率的影响。方法选择2007年1月至2009年1月在健康体检中心体检时确诊为原发性高血压的患者1183例,按照分层随机分组法分为干预组587例和对照组596例。对照组在入组后进行1次健康教育,之后由患者自行管理,对治疗和行为不做要求,每年进行1次随访。干预组给予定期随访及综合性治疗干预措施(包括药物和非药物),按评估→计划→实施→评价4个基本步骤循环进行,定期跟踪随访3年。结果综合干预3年后,干预组高血压治疗率和控制率(分别为89.8%,69.5%)明显高于对照组(分别为36.4%,22.1%),组间差异有统计学意义(X^2值分别为360.92,267.34;P均〈0.01);干预组饮食控制、参加体育活动、限酒和戒烟者的比率(分别为68.5%,71.9%,88.9%,87.4%)均高于对照组(分别为37.2%,58.2%,49.3%,66.9%),组间差异有统计学意义(妒值分别为117.94,30.62,220.62,71.18;P均〈0.01);干预组胆固醇、甘油三酯、血糖、血清肌酐和BMI值[分别为(4.34-0.7)mmol/L,(1.52±0.5)mmol/L,(5.3±0.8)mmol/L,(93.2±12.5)p.mol/L,(23.7±4.4)kg/㎡]均低于对照组[分别为(4.9±0.4)mmol/L,(1.76±0.6)mmol/L,(5.7±0.7)mmol/L,(99.54-15.8)moL/L,(26.6±4.8)kg/㎡],组间差异有统计学意义(t值分别为18.134,7.468,9.156,7.598,10.828;P均〈0.05)。结论实施个性化药物及非药物综合干预措施,可以降低各种危险因素,提高原发性高血压患者对保健知识的认知度,纠正不良行为方式和生活习惯,减轻心理压力和紧张情绪,提高患者的药物依从性,从而提高对高血�Objective To explore the influence of comprehensive intervention and regular follow-up on hypertension awareness, treatment rate, control rate and its complications incidence rate of the patients who were diagnosed as primary hypertension in physical examination. Methods Selected 1 183 cases that were diagnosed as primary hypertension in our health examination center from January 2007 to January 2009, which were divided into the intervention group ( n = 587 ) and the control group ( n = 596) randomly. The control group was given a health education at the first, then the patients managed themselves, their treatment and behavior were not required, and we followed them annual. The intervention group was given regular follow-up and comprehensive treatment intervention (including drug and non-drug), we followed the four basic steps that assessment→plan→ implementation→evaluation in circulation, and regular followed-up for 3 years. Results After 3 years, hypertension treatment rate and control rate in the intervention group (89.8%, 69.5% ) was higher than that in the control group (36.4% , 22.1% ) , and the difference was statistically significant (~2 = 360.92, 267.34, respectively; P 〈 0. O1 ). The ratio of diet control, participate in sports activities, wine limited and smoking cessation in the intervention group (68.5% , 71.9%, 88.9% , 87.4% ) were higher than those in the control group (37.2%. 58.2%. 49. 3%. 66.9% ). and the differences between the two groups were statistically,significant (X2 = 117. 94, 30. 62, 220. 62, 71. 18, respectively; P 〈 0. 01 ). The values of cholesterol, triglycerides, blood glucose, serum creatinine, and BMI in the intervention group [ (4.3± 0.7)mmol/L, ( 1.52 ±0.5) mmol/L, ( 5.3 ± 0.8) mmol/L, (93.2 + 12.5 ) mol/L, ( 23.7 + 4.4) kg/m2 ] were lower than those in the control group [ (4.9 ±0.4) retool/L, ( 1.76 ± 0.6) mmol/L, (5.7 + 0.7 ) retool/L, (99.5 ± 15.8 ) mol/L, (26.6±4.8) kg/m2 ], a
分 类 号:R544.1[医药卫生—心血管疾病]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...