论袁世凯政府对西藏危机的因应  

Analysis on Yuan Shi-kai Government's Response to Tibet Crisis

作　　者：朱昭华[1] 

机构地区：[1]苏州科技学院历史系,江苏苏州215009

出　　处：《西藏研究》2012年第6期47-57,共11页Tibetan Studies

基　　金：2010年度教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(编号10YJC770130)阶段性研究成果之一;2010年度校课题基金资助

摘　　要：进入中华民国后,中国的边疆危机进一步加深。面对英国对西藏问题的公开干涉,袁世凯政府运用了各种方法,包括劝诱西藏接受"五族共和"的观念,支持共和政权,对英国施压的谈判采取拖延战术以便取得与西藏直接谈判的成功。囿于中国的实力,这些方法都未能取得成功。在随后的西姆拉会议期间,北京政府的政策是前后一致并且合理的,只是在袁世凯迫切需要英国支持其帝制方案时,中国的对藏政策才失去了先前的气势,变得更具和解性。即使如此,袁世凯仍然希望在西藏东部保存一块明显比英国愿意让予中国的更大的地区,作为英国在藏势力范围与中国之间的缓冲带,从而保护中国的西南边界。In the early Republic of China,Chinese frontier crisis became more serious. Facing British in- terference in Tibet issue publicly,the Yuan Shi- kai government used a variety of methods,such as per- suading Tibetan to accept the thought of ＂Republic of Five Ethnic Group＂, supporting republican re- gime,resisting Britain pressure on tripartite talks held by China,Tibet and Britain,while attempting to obtain the success of the direct negotiations with Tibet. Due to the weakness of China＇s central govern- ment,these methods had not been successful. During the subsequent Simla Conference, Beijing govern- ment＇s policy on Tibet was consistent and reasonable. Only when Yuan Shi- kai urgently needed British support for his imperial program,Chinese policy lost its earlier momentum and became more conciliatory. Even so,Yuan Shi-kai still hoped to retain a larger area than what Britain was willing to let China hold in eastern Tibet as a buffer zone between British sphere of influence in Tibet and Sichuan, on which British ultimately can＇t make concession.

关 键 词：袁世凯 英国 西藏问题 划界 

分 类 号：K258[历史地理—历史学]