经鼻内窥镜鼻中隔矫正术与传统鼻中隔矫正术的临床比较观察  

The Clinical Comparative Observation of Endoscopic Nasal Septal Reconstruction and Traditional Correction of Nasal Septum

作　　者：吴敬东[1] 

机构地区：[1]南京医科大学附属常州第二人民医院阳湖院区耳鼻咽喉-头颈外科,南京213000

出　　处：《中国医药导刊》2012年第12期2045-2046,共2页Chinese Journal of Medicinal Guide

摘　　要：目的:探讨经鼻内窥镜鼻中隔矫正术与传统鼻中隔矫正术的临床比较效果。方法:分析我院收治的鼻中隔偏曲患者60例临床资料进行分析,依据治疗方式不同分为对照组(传统鼻中隔矫正术治疗组)30例和观察组(经鼻内窥镜鼻中隔矫正术治疗组)30例。结果:观察组手术时间、术中出血量均低于对照组,观察组临床治疗总有效率、术后疼痛、粘骨膜完整性、术后并发症均优于对照组,P>0.05,差异均有统计学意义。结论:经鼻内窥镜鼻中隔矫正术创伤小、效果好,值得临床推广应用。Objective：To approach clinical comparative result of endoscopic nasal septal reconstruction and traditional correction of nasal septum.Methods：To analyze 60 cases clinical data of deviation of nasal septum in our hospital,which was to be divided into control group（traditional correction of nasal septum group）30 cases and detection group（endoscopic nasal septal reconstruction group）30 cases.Results：The operation time、amount of bleeding in operation of detection group were lower than control group,the clinical treatment of total efficiency、postoperative pain periosteum of integrity postoperative complications of detection group were better than control group,P0.05,the difference were statistical significance.Conclusion：The small wound good effect of endoscopic nasal septal reconstruction,which was to be used.

关 键 词：经鼻内窥镜鼻中隔矫正术 传统鼻中隔矫正术 

分 类 号：R765.9[医药卫生—耳鼻咽喉科]