检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国地质大学(北京)土地科学技术学院,北京100083 [2]国土资源部土地整治重点实验室,北京100035
出 处:《中国土地科学》2012年第11期15-20,共6页China Land Science
摘 要:研究目的:通过理论分析,探讨中国土地所有制二元结构的理论根源、社会政治根源、法理根源,倡导一种较为合理的制度设计,化解现实矛盾。研究方法:从土地二元格局出发,借助现代宪政财产权理论,通过概括、分析学术界就此问题的三种看法,对有关观点进行分析论证,回归宪法确立的权利保护原则,反思现有土地制度。研究结果:土地二元结构长久以来对推进中国经济社会发展和国家重大发展战略的落实发挥了历史性作用,但在新的历史条件下这一基本格局已不能完全适应公民财产权利保护的需要。研究结论:在新的社会变革中,政策导向或社会立法应对此进行必要的调整,在国家复兴的进程中兼顾公民的土地权利,推进社会进步。The purpose of this paper is to explore the theoretical,social,political and legal principle source of the dual structure of land ownership in China,aiming to advocate a more reasonable system to resolve the practical contradictions.Methods used include property rights theory on modern constitution.It starts from the source of the dual structure,and then goes to the three major academic views on the structures,and then returns to the principle of protecting the rights that constitution has established,and eventually rethink the current land system.Results show that for a long time,the dual structure of land ownership in China has promoted economic and social development of China,and played a historic role during the implementation of the major national development strategies.But under the new historical conditions this basic pattern has not completely met the needs of protecting the property rights of the citizens.The paper concludes that policy and social legislation should be adjusted to protect the land rights of the citizens and to promote the social progress during the national revival in China.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.233