检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘录护[1]
机构地区:[1]华南师范大学教育科学学院
出 处:《当代青年研究》2012年第12期74-80,共7页Contemporary Youth Research
基 金:广东省哲学社会科学规划项目"学校对于学生的偏好机制研究"项目成果;项目编号:GD10YJY02
摘 要:青少年偷窃行为对青少年自身和社会具有严重危害性,因此,对青少年偷窃行为应加以重视。将青少年犯罪的类型化分析与心理学有关偷窃的解释理论相结合,有利于加强对青少年偷窃行为的研究。对3个案例的研究发现:精神满足低导致孩子的不良行为,同时物质满足低导致学生的偷窃行为;影响孩子精神满足的客观因素是家长职业时间,在大城市影响学生物质满足的因素则是家长主观上的教育方式。在孩子因客观制约而无法获得精神满足时,给与孩子较多的物质满足是更优策略;应对孩子的偷窃与其他不良行为,教师的精神关怀比批评与惩罚更有效。The juvenile theft is of serious danger for young people and society. Therefore, attention should be paid to teenager theft. It is conducive to strengthen the study of juvenile theft by combining juvenile delinquency type analysis and psychology theory about theft.By comparison of 3 similar cases, the study finds that: Firstly, low spiritual satisfaction leads to children's bad behavior, and low material satisfaction results in the theft behavior; Secondly, objective factor affecting children's spiritual satisfaction is parents" career time and factor influencing students" substance meeting in big cities is subjective education of parents. When the child was unable to gain spiritual satisfaction because of objective constraints, giving more substance to meet with the child is a better policy. Thirdly, responding to child's theft and bad behavior, the spiritual cares of teachers are more effective than criticism and punishment.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30