科学总结后发展国家社会主义的历史经验和规律性——对“东方社会理论”的质疑  

Scientifically Review the Historical Experience and Regularities of Socialism in Developing Countries:Doubts against the “Theory of Oriental Society”

作　　者：陈文通[1] 

机构地区：[1]中共中央党校经济学教研部,北京海淀100091

出　　处：《中国延安干部学院学报》2013年第1期42-65,41,共25页Journal of China Executive Leadership Academy Yan’an

摘　　要：如何总结后发展国家社会主义的历史经验和规律性,是一个十分重要的问题。所谓"马克思主义东方社会理论"及其相关范畴,不能认为是对历史事实和经典作家理论思想的科学概括和严谨归纳,对此理应提出质疑。一些"东方学"学者所提出的问题多半是重要的;问题在于,当前理论家最重要的使命,不是独出心裁地构筑什么"马克思主义东方社会理论体系",而是深刻总结"十月革命"以来共产主义运动正反两方面的历史经验,总结后发展国家走上社会主义道路的历史经验和规律性,重新审视传统社会主义的理论和实践,为后发展国家正确选择发展道路提供科学的理论支撑。How to conclude the historical experience and laws of socialism in developing countries is a vitally important issue. The so called ＂Marxist theory of oriental society＂ and the related concepts cannot be regarded as scientific summarization or rigorous induction of the historical facts and thoughts of the classical writers. It should be questioned. Most questions raised by some scholars of ＂orientalism＂ are important. But the problem is that the most important mission for the current theorists is not to inventively construct some ,6 system of Marxist theory of ori- ental society,＂ but to profoundly sum up positive and negative historical experience of communist movement since the ＂October Revolution,＂ sum up the historical experience and laws for the developing countries to take socialist path, reexamine the theories and practices of traditional socialism, and provide scientific theoretical support for the developing countries to choose a correct path for development.

关 键 词：东方社会理论 后发展国家社会主义 传统社会主义理论 落后国家发展道路 

分 类 号：D0-0[政治法律—政治学]