检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈志东[1]
出 处:《上海医药》2013年第3期29-31,共3页Shanghai Medical & Pharmaceutical Journal
摘 要:目的:对DDD的误区进行分析。方法:通过对国内药物利用分析类文献的比较,找出DDD的误区。结果:国内DDD的误区体现在4个方面:DDD是临床限制用药剂量、DDD是处方日剂量、DDD设定行为个体化和DDD设定方法多样化。结论:我国DDD存在一些误区,不利于药物利用分析工作的开展,应引起足够重视。Objective: To analyze some misunderstandings about define daily dose (DDD). Methods: The misunderstandings about DDD are found by comparing Chinese articles on drug utilization analysis. Results: There are four kinds of misunderstandings about DDD, the first is to limit daily dose, the second is prescribed daily dose, the third is different from individual assigner, and the fourth is multi-assignment methods. Conclusion: There are some misunderstandings about DDD in China, and attention should be paid because they are not conducive to carrying out the work of drug utilization analysis.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38