检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]上海市浦东新区南华医院药剂科,上海201300
出 处:《上海医药》2013年第3期39-42,共4页Shanghai Medical & Pharmaceutical Journal
摘 要:目的:观察临床药师干预对呼吸病区抗菌药物应用的影响。方法:分别选取呼吸病区2011年1-5月(干预前)和2012年1-5月(干预后)的抗菌药物使用数据,比较抗菌药物合理使用情况,计量资料采用t检验,计数资料采用x2检验。结果:干预后该病区抗菌药物使用率由96.08%降至71.43%;单药应用率由19.18%上升为41.76%(P<0.01),二联用药由78.78%降至56.47%(P<0.01);不合理用药的表现由55.69%降至13.44%(P<0.01)。结论:临床药师的干预能促进抗菌药物的合理应用。Objective: To observe the effect of clinical pharmacist interventions on the application of antimicrobial agents in respiratory ward. Methods: Data of antimicrobial medication in January-May 2011 (before intervention) and in January-May 2012 (intervention) in our respiratory ward were selected to compare the rational use of antimicrobials in case, and measurement and count data were checked by t test and xe test, respectively. Results: After the intervention, the rate of the use of antimicrobial agents was reduced from 96.08% to 71.43% in this ward. Single drug application rate increased from 19.18% to 41.76% (P 〈 0.01) and the combined medication of two drugs decreased from 78.78% to 56.47% (P 〈 0.01). Irrational drug use decreased from 55.69% to 13.44% (P 〈 0.01). Conclusion: The rational use of antimicrobials can be promoted by the intervention of clinical pharmacists.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.118.126.159