检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:Young-Sim Choi Jun-Ho Hong Ho-Young Hwang
机构地区:[1]e-Design Center,Korea Institute of Industrial Technology,Incheon 406-840,Korea
出 处:《China Foundry》2013年第1期50-56,共7页中国铸造(英文版)
摘 要:In the present research,two numerical schemes for improving the accuracy of the solution in the flow simulation of molten metal were applied.One method is the Piecewise Linear Interface Calculation(PLIC) method and the other is the Donor-Acceptor(D-A) method.To verify the module of the interface reconstruction algorithms,simple problems were tested.After these validations,the accuracy and efficiency of these two methods were compared by simulating various real products.On the numerical simulation of free surface flow,it is possible for the PLIC method to track very accurately the interface between phases.The PLIC method,however,has the weak point in that a lot of computational time is required,though it shows the more accurate interface reconstruction.The Donor-Acceptor method has enough effectiveness in the macro-observation of a mold filling sequence though it shows inferior accuracy.Therefore,for the problems that need the accurate solution,PLIC is more appropriate than D-A.More accuracy may cause less efficiency in numerical analysis.Which method between D-A method and PLIC method should be chosen depends on the product.In the present research, two numerical schemes for improving the accuracy of the solution in the flow simulation of molten metal were applied. One method is the Piecewise Linear Interface Calculation (PLIC) method and the other is the Donor-Acceptor (D-A) method. To verify the module of the interface reconstruction algorithms, simple problems were tested. After these validations, the accuracy and efficiency of these two methods were compared by simulating various real products. On the numerical simulation of free surface flow, it is possible for the PLIC method to track very accurately the interface between phases. The PLIC method, however, has the weak point in that a lot of computational time is required, though it shows the more accurate interface reconstruction. The Donor-Acceptor method has enough effectiveness in the macro-observation of a mold filling sequence though it shows inferior accuracy. Therefore, for the problems that need the accurate solution, PLIC is more appropriate than D-A. More accuracy may cause less efficiency in numerical analysis. Which method between D-A method and PLIC method should be chosen depends on the product.
关 键 词:interface reconstruction DA PLIC molten metal flow ACCURACY volume of fluid method
分 类 号:TP391.9[自动化与计算机技术—计算机应用技术]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15