检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]福建医科大学附属协和医院呼吸内科,福州350000
出 处:《中华老年医学杂志》2013年第2期162-164,共3页Chinese Journal of Geriatrics
摘 要:目的评价大剂量沐舒坦静脉注射在治疗慢性阻塞性肺病急性加重期(AECOPD)的临床疗效。方法选择126例AECOPD患者,按随机对照原则分为三组:对照组40例,仅给予抗生素治疗、吸氧及支气管扩张剂等治疗;常规剂量沐舒坦组(常规剂量组)40例,给予沐舒坦30mg,3次/d静脉滴注治疗7d,其余治疗与对照组相同;大剂量沐舒坦组(大剂量组)46例,给予沐舒坦150mg,2次/d治疗7d,其余治疗与对照组相同。结果大剂量组和常规剂量组治疗总有效率分别为95.6%、77.5%,均显著高于对照组55.0%(x2=19.阻、4.53,均P〈0.05)。大剂量组和常规剂量组平均住院日分别为(10.78±0.95)d,(11.75±0.84)d,均显著低于对照组(13.15±0.89)d(q=1l·88、7·24,均P〈0.05),且大剂量组临床疗效更好。结论大剂量沐舒坦治疗AECOPD患者疗效显著。目安全性好。Objective To evaluate the etticacy and salety oi hlgn-ctose amoroxoi in treaung acute exacerbations in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD). Methods The trial design was random, open, and parallel control. 126 patients with AECOPD were involved. High-dose group received ambroxol 150 mg 3 times per day for 7 days (n= 46), while conventional-dose group given amhroxol 30 mg 3 times per day for 7 days (n=40) and control group was given a routine treatment (antibiotic therapy, oxygen inhalation and bronchodilators) (n= 40). Results The effective rates of high-dose group and conventional dose group (95.6 ~, 77.5 ~) were significantly higher compared with control group (55.0~) (Z2 19.81, 4.53, both P〈0.05). The average duration of hospitalization was significantly lower in high-dose group (10.78 ± 0.95)d and conventional-dose group (11.75±0.84)d comparing with control group (13.15±0.89)d (q= 11.88, 7.24, both P〈0.05). The clinical efficacy in high dose group was much better. Conclusions High dose ambroxol is a safe and efficient therapy in the treatment of acute exacerbations in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
关 键 词:沐舒坦 慢性阻塞性肺病急性加重期 静脉滴注
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229