检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]贵州省疾控中心传染病防治研究所检验科,贵阳550004
出 处:《贵州医药》2012年第5期402-404,共3页Guizhou Medical Journal
基 金:贵州省卫生厅科学技术基金[gzwki 2009-1-037];贵州省科学技术基金[黔科合J字(2011)2280号]资助项目
摘 要:目的分析比较磁珠法和滤膜法提取病毒核酸的重复性及灵敏度。方法选用国产的磁珠法和滤膜法试剂同时提取核酸检测临床手足口病标本,荧光相对定量比较两种方法的重复性及灵敏度。结果磁珠法提取核酸的标本用量较少,成功率较高,磁珠法试剂检测重复性较好,灵敏度较高。结论磁珠法提取核酸在手足口病的荧光定量检测中优于滤膜法。Objective To investigate the repeatability and sensitivity of the magnetic bead and filter extracting reagents for extracting nuclear acids. Methods The magnetic bead and filter extracting reagents(domestic) were used in extracting the nuclear acids from HFMD clinical specimens.Compared repeatability and sensitivity of the two reagents by real-time relatively quantify RT-PCR. Results For extracting the nuclear acids,the magnetic bead reagent had consumed less specimens,and had higher success rate.There were better repeatability(CVmagnetic bead<CVfilter membrane)and sensitivity(ΔΔCt magnetic bead<ΔΔCt filter membrane)of the magnetic bead reagent. Conclusion The ways that extract nuclear acids from HFMD clinical specimens with magnetic bead reagent(domestic) was better than filter membrane reagent(domestic).
分 类 号:R33[医药卫生—人体生理学] R446.61[医药卫生—基础医学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.166