检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《工程力学》2013年第2期285-291,共7页Engineering Mechanics
基 金:中央高校基本科研业务费青年专项基金项目(2009QNA4022);国家自然科学基金项目(11172266)
摘 要:该文总结了部分抗剪连接组合梁挠度计算的不同方法,并通过对均布荷载作用下两端简支组合梁跨中挠度的对比分析,讨论了各种方法的特点。针对现行规范中采用的折减刚度法所存在的问题,进行了分析研究,提出了组合梁挠度计算的改进折减刚度法。理论分析和数值结果表明,改进的折减刚度法克服了规范中的折减刚度法所存在的抗剪连接程度增大,组合梁抗弯刚度反而减小导致挠度增大的矛盾,同时考虑了边界条件对折减刚度的影响,且与精确解相比,两者吻合较好。Some methods to calculate the deflection of composite beams with partial shear interaction were summarized, and the characteristics of these methods were discussed through the mid-span deflection of a simply supported beam acted by uniformly distributed load. The drawbacks of the reduced stiffness method (RSM) used in the current code for design steel structures were analyzed theoretically and a modified reduced-stiffness method (MRSM) for calculating the deflection of composite beams was proposed. Theoretical analysis and numerical examples show that the MRSM can overcome the drawbacks of the RSM, avoiding the conflict of bending stiffness of composite beams decreasing with the stiffness of the shear connectors. The MRSM can also take into account the influence ofbotmdary conditions on the reduced stiffness and has a good agreement with the exact solution.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222