略论《七录》与《七志》“所宗有不同”、“其教有浅深”  

Brief Analysis of the Different Tenets and Concepts of Qi Lu and Qi Zhi

作　　者：于峻嵘[1] 刘丽媛[1] 

机构地区：[1]河北师范大学文学院,河北石家庄050024

出　　处：《河北北方学院学报（社会科学版）》2012年第6期1-3,11,共4页Journal of Hebei North University：Social Science Edition

摘　　要：《七志》《七录》是两部极重要的目录书,于南朝时期问世。较前代,这两部目录中新增了对佛、道书籍的著录。《七录》的撰者阮孝绪说,《七录》与《七志》"所宗有不同"、"其教有浅深"。对此说法进行了分析验证,探究了阮氏的目录学观念。指出其目录中给予佛、道类别地位的做法,推动了目录体例之趋于完备,表现出目录学者对于思想发展的尊崇。《七录》对后代目录学发展产生了深远影响,不但表现为其为确立正统地位的四部分类法创造了条件,也表现为其为当时长足发展的佛、道类书目的著录创造了条件。以书籍目录的方式来反映时代思想的繁盛多元,这是对时代思想进展的客观审视的体现,是目录文献为后世的思想研究提供的静态记载,是记录思想史发展的特殊体式。Qi Lu and Qi Zhi are two most important bibliographies in the South Dynasties.Compared with the previous ones,Buddhist and Taoist books are added to these two books.Ruan Xiaoxü,the editor of Qi Lu,thinks that Qi Lu and Qi Zhi are different in purpose and view.The paper verifies this statement and explores Ruan＇s concepts of bibliography.The study indicates that the practice of his classifying Buddhist and Taoist books makes classes of bibliography more perfect and shows bibliographers＇ worship of the development of intellectual history.The profound influence of Qi Lu on the later bibliography reflects that it creates the conditions for both four-branch classification and the record of Buddhist and Taoist books.Such an approach represents pluralistic thoughts and objective inspection of the times by the book catalogue.Writing bibliography seems static,but it is a special form of recording intellectual history.

关 键 词：阮孝绪 《七志》 王俭 《七录》 类例 佛道书目 

分 类 号：I209[文学—中国文学]