检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王化起[1]
机构地区:[1]香港理工大学应用社会科学系
出 处:《中国农村观察》2012年第6期31-39,93,共9页China Rural Survey
摘 要:改革开放以来,集体经济的效率问题一直是学术界关注的热点。于20世纪90年代初诞生于珠三角地区的股份合作社代表了集体经济的一种新模式,它使得村集体可以通过流转农业用地获取高额地租,支持本社区的经济和社会发展。与乡镇企业一样,这样的高效率也符合人们对于社会主义转型期中国式道路的想象。然而,村干部的私有化阻碍了股份合作社的效率,村干部在股份合作社中不仅集中控制了土地等集体资产及其收益分配权,而且还控制了股份社的决策和管理,将普通村民排除在了参与和监督之外。在此情况下,干部私有化既背离了民众参与和利益分配平等的原则,又有可能导致股份合作社的不稳定,从而破坏其经济效率。Ever since the transition of collective economy in post-reform China,a new organization,the Shareholding Cooperative in Pearl River Delta is set off towards non-agricultural land rent.Just like collective enterprises(TVEs),the Cooperative also realizes high economic efficiency in the market.Though it seems again to prove socialist transition of a Chinese style,there is a problem of the privatization of public properties by cadres in this economy.Village officials often abuse their positional power to gain private benefits from public resources.This corruption deteriorates in the Cooperative: cadres concentrate collective land and dominate the allocation of land surplus.Meanwhile,village cadres also control the decision-making and management,and deprive ordinary peasants of the participation and supervision.As cadres’ privatization interrupts equal allocation of benefits and rights of peasants in the organization,they thus possibly collapse the organization,and finally ruin its economic efficiency.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117