中文版老年抑郁量表在城市社区老年人群中应用的信效度研究  

Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of Geriatric Depression Scale Among Chinese Urban Community-dwelling Elderly Population

作　　者：刘杰[1] 王瑛[2] 王晓慧[2] 宋瑞华[3] 易晓宏[2] 

机构地区：[1]中国人民解放军第261医院精神四科,北京100094 [2]中国人民解放军第261医院心理科,北京100094 [3]中国人民解放军第261医院心理危机干预中心,北京100094

出　　处：《中国临床心理学杂志》2013年第1期39-41,共3页Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology

摘　　要：目的:评价中文版老年抑郁量表(GDS)在城市社区老年人中应用的信度和效度。方法:于北京三个城市社区方便抽取397位60岁以上老年人接受中文版GDS、流调中心抑郁量表(CES-D)和生命质量量表(QOLS)评定,其中45位老年人完成了两周后的GDS重测。结果:中文版GDS条目-总分相关系数在0.248～0.567之间(P均<0.01),平均为0.414;内部一致性Cronbachα系数为0.846,两周重测信度系数为0.812(P<0.01);GDS总分与CES-D总分和QOLS总分的效标关联效度系数分别为0.787和-0.450(P均<0.01);结构效度分析GDS具有单维度特征。结论:中文版GDS在城市社区老年人中具有满意的信效度。Objective： To determine the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Geriatric Depression Scale （GDS） in a population of Chinese urban community-dwelling elderly. Methods： A random sample of 397 residents aged 60 and above was selected from 3 urban communities in Beijing. All the participants were administered GDS, the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale（CES-D）, and Quality of Life Scale（QOLS）, of whom 45 received GDS re-as- sessment after 2 weeks. Results： The item-total correlation coefficients of GDS ranged from 0.248 to 0.567, the average coefficient was 0.414. The internal consistency Cronbach ot coefficient of GDS was 0.846 and the two-week re-test reliability was 0.812. Its criterion-related validity coefficients for CES-D and QOLS were 0.787 and -0.450, respectively. The construct validity analysis revealed its unidimensional feature. Conclusion： The Chinese version of GDS has good reliability and validity for Chinese urban community-dwelling elderly population.

关 键 词：老年抑郁量表 信度 效度 

分 类 号：R395.1[哲学宗教—心理学]