检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]华南师范大学政治与行政学院,广州510631 [2]华南师范大学心理学院,广州510631
出 处:《中国临床心理学杂志》2013年第1期42-44,共3页Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基 金:2010年国家社会科学基金项目(10CSH014);广东省突发事件心理援助应急技术研究中心资助
摘 要:目的:检验反刍思维反应量表(RRS)在中国职业女性群体中的信、效度。方法:首先用中文版反刍思维反应量表测量了250名职业女性(样本1);接着又用中文版反刍思维反应量表、自评抑郁量表、特质焦虑量表、生活满意度量表对427名职业女性(样本2)进行了测量,两周后对样本2中的245名被试进行了重测。结果:①中文版RRS的所有项目的决断值在3.059~12.135之间.均达到0.Ol及其以上水平显著。项目与量表总分的相关在0.411-0.628之间,均具有统计学意义(P〈0.01);②探索性因子分析显示,RRS由三因子构成。验证性因子分析显示三因子模型拟合指数为χ2/df=-2.50,RMSEA=0.061,Nn=0.93,NNFI=0.95,CFI=0.96,GFI=O.90;③RRS总分及三个因子的Cronbachd系数在0.741~0.879之间、两周后的重测信度在0.768~0.823之间;@RRS总分及三个因子均与生活满意度呈显著负相关,与抑郁、焦虑呈显著正相关。结论:RRS在中国职业女性群体具有良好的信、效度。Objective: To investigate the reliability and validity of the RRS in Chinese working women. Methods: A sample of 250 working women (Sample One) participated in the study by completing the Chinese version of Rumination Response Scale; and then a sample of 427 working women (Sample Two) was chosen as subjects to complete the Chinese version of Rumination Response Scale, Self-Rating Depression Scale, Trait Anxiety Inventory, and Life Satisfaction Scale. 245 of Sample Two were re-tested after two weeks. Results: ①The critical ratios of all items in the Chinese version of Rumination Response Scale ranged from 3.059 to 12.135, and were significant at 0.01 level and above. The correlation coefficients between each item and the total score of the scale ranged from 0.411 to 0.628, and all were statistically signifi- cant(P〈0.01). ②Exploratory factor analysis showed that the RRS consisted of three factors. Confirmatory factor analysis revealed that the fit indices for the three-factor model were χ2/df=2.50, RMSEA=0.061, NFI=0.93, NNFI=0.95, CFI=0.96, GFI=0.90. Cronbach α coefficient of the three factors and the RRS total score were from 0.741 to 0.879. And the testretest reliabilities after two weeks were between 0.768 to 0.823. ④The total score of the RRS and the three factors were all significantly negatively correlated with life satisfaction, but positively related to depression and anxiety significantly. Conclusion: The RRS has good reliability and validity in Chinese working women.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.173