陈寅恪、吕思勉治史风格的异同——以唐高祖称臣突厥之考辨为例  

The Historiographic Style of Chen Yinque and Lü Simian

作　　者：张耕华[1] 

机构地区：[1]华东师范大学历史系,上海200241

出　　处：《学术月刊》2013年第2期132-140,共9页Academic Monthly

基　　金：2012年度国家社科立项项目"吕思勉史学研究"(12BZS003)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：陈寅恪和吕思勉是中国现代著名的史学大家,他们的治史都以研读传统典籍为基础,也都继承了中国历史上的史学传统。陈寅恪的治史讲究精深,思路上偏好往深度走,好坐实史事,好循点点滴滴的蛛丝马迹做细节上高妙的推论。吕思勉的治史追求淹博,不拘泥于历史细节,考史叙事的思路偏好往宽度走,虽有考辨,但谨慎小心,未敢推断坐实。陈寅恪、吕思勉两位都是纯粹的历史学者,但都非常关心社会现场,其著述之命意,常希望在历史中寻求经验教训,而非纯粹为史实而考证史实。论者常常关注陈、吕两位治史上的前一方面成就,而对后者则有所忽视,其实,这是他们治史的重要特色,也是中国史学史上珍贵的学术遗产。Chen Yinque and Lti Simian are two famous ntstorlan. history studying historical literatures and inherited the fine tradition of Chinese historiography. Chen＇s study strives for profound. Preference confirmed historical events and make inferences from the details, Lti Simian pursuit of deep and wide in history. He is discreet and does not rigidly adhere to the historical details. Chen Yinque, Lii Simian, the two are purely historical scholars, at the same time are very concerned about the social scene. They want to seek lessons from history and not only for historical facts. This is an important feature of their history study, also the precious heritage of Chinese history.

关 键 词：陈寅恪 吕思勉 治史异同 

分 类 号：K207[历史地理—历史学]