检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴占英[1]
出 处:《政法论丛》2013年第1期111-117,共7页Journal of Political Science and Law
基 金:司法部国家法治与法学理论研究项目<刑法在民族自治地方的变通补充问题研究>(06SFB5012)的阶段性成果
摘 要:中俄两国刑法典有关危害食品安全犯罪的规定在构成要件、犯罪既遂标准以及处罚等方面有所不同,两国刑法典有关危害食品安全犯罪的规定各具特色。俄罗斯刑法典将该类犯罪归类于危害公共安全类犯罪的做法值得我国借鉴;其规制行为内容多、规制目标广的做法更有利于对消费者合法权益的保护;其量刑情节设置具体、细腻的做法也有参考价值;罚金刑的设置方式也具有一定的借鉴意义。This paper carries on the contrast between the two countries criminal law' s the provisions of food safety crimes from legislation, constitutive requirements, standard for crime accomplishment and punishment. The Chinese and Russian Criminal law have the distinctive points. It is worth using for reference that Russian criminal code categorizes this kind of crime in the crime of endangering public security. The regulation of more behavior con-tent and wide target is more beneficial to the protection of consumers' legal rights and interests. The practice of spe-cific and exquisite sentencing circumstances set also has reference value and fine punishment setting way has the ra-tionality.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15