Brink量表评估压力性尿失禁女性盆底肌张力的临床应用价值  

作　　者：周卫阳[1] 李环[1] 李芬[2] 陈月英[3] 陈瑜[1] 张巍颖[1] 来永庆[3] 李贤新[3] 

机构地区：[1]北京大学深圳医院妇产科,518036 [2]北京大学深圳医院特诊科,518036 [3]北京大学深圳医院泌尿外科,518036

出　　处：《当代医学》2013年第6期1-3,共3页Contemporary Medicine

基　　金：2011年度深圳市科技计划项目(201102022)

摘　　要：目的探讨Brink量表评估压力性尿失禁女性盆底肌张力与患者临床特征、下尿路症状的相关性。方法选取2008年1月～2011年12月手术治疗的134例压力性尿失禁女性患者,Brink量表评估盆底肌张力,采用方差分析和线性回归方法分析Brink评分与患者临床特征、尿失禁症状问卷结果、尿动力学结果、排尿日记数据、尿垫试验结果之间的关系。结果 Brink量表平均分为(8.67±1.35分,SD=2.03),Brink评分与年龄、阴道分娩次数、子宫切除手术史、尿失禁症状相关(P<0.05),与排尿日记尿漏次数及尿垫试验重量无相关性。结论压力性尿失禁女性盆底肌张力较好,Brink量表在临床盆底肌功能评估中具有一定价值。Objective To invesitgate the clinical relationship between pelvic-floor muscles strength（ PFM） and patient characteristics, lower urinary tract symptoms in stress Urinary incontinent women. Methods 134 stress urinary incontinent women treated with surgical operation were recruited. Patient demographic variables, baseline urinary incontinence symptom questionnaires, urodynamic data and urinary diary data, pad test results were compared with PFM strength as described by the Brink scoring system. Bivariate analysis of factors associated with the Brink scale score was done using analysis of variance and linear regression. Results The mean Brink scale score was（8.67±1.35,SD=2.03） , the relationship between age and Brink score is statistically strong. Brink scores were not related to diary and pad test measures of incontinence severity. Conclusion PFM strength was good in this sample of women with stress incontinence, the Brink scale may play role in PFM strength evaluation.

关 键 词：盆底肌 尿失禁 Brink量表 

分 类 号：R711[医药卫生—妇产科学]