中外科学伦理发展比较研究  

A Comparative Study on Development of Science Ethics Between China and Foreign Countries

作　　者：刘国云[1] 

机构地区：[1]东南大学人文学院,南京211189

出　　处：《自然辩证法研究》2013年第2期59-64,共6页Studies in Dialectics of Nature

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目"现代科技伦理的应然逻辑研究"(12BZX078)

摘　　要：对中外科学伦理发展状况的比较研究有助于明确我国科学伦理中的问题并探寻解决路径。通过主题词频次的计量了解科学伦理研究的热点,以数据对比呈现研究差异,在总体的学术趋势的分析中显现研究特点及不足。在伦理建制与规范保障方面,中国稍显滞后,国外在科学伦理具体问题方面的研究更细致。在伦理环境上,西方注重分析与还原,倚重责任来联系原子化的科学与伦理。中国传统上更注重整体性的目标,对于中国的科学伦理来说,应当结合自身文化中的合理性,对科学与伦理形成自身的批判性与专业性。避免既抛弃了擅长处理科学伦理的有机联系的传统,在科学伦理的具体问题上又缺乏深入的分析。A comparative study on the development of science ethics between China and foreign countries helps to identify problems of science ethics in China and explore a problem—solution approach. Metering of theme word frequency helps to reveal research hotspots, comparison of the data presents differences between Chinese and foreign research, analysis of overall academic trends shows research characteristics and deficiencies. In the field of organizational structure of ethics and safeguard mechanism for norms, there is a little lag in China. In addition, foreign research appears more detailed in specific problems. As far as ethical environment concerns, West emphasis on analysis and reduction, prefers responsibility to contact atomic science and ethics. China traditionally pays more attention to the holistic goal. Science ethics in China should develop its own criticism and professionalism in its own culture background. The worst situation to avoid is that we not only abandon tradition, which is good at dealing with organic connection of science and ethics, but also lack in-depth analysis of specific issues of science ethics.

关 键 词：科学伦理 发展 比较 

分 类 号：N031[自然科学总论—科学技术哲学]