检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中海油田服务股份有限公司
出 处:《中国海上油气》2013年第1期43-45,共3页China Offshore Oil and Gas
摘 要:对利用电缆地层测试资料计算储层流度的2种方法进行了比较,认为在低渗透地层积分法比压力降落法更为可靠;探讨了电缆地层测试计算流度与DST采油指数之间的关系,在计算采油指数时因考虑非渗透夹层而提出了"等效厚度采油指数",使其反映储层的真实产能,实际资料统计表明电缆地层测试流度与"等效厚度采油指数"呈正相关,这为利用电缆地层测试资料进行产能预测提供了新思路。Two methods to calculate reservoir mob ility by using wireline formation test data were compared, and it is believed that the integral meth- od is more reliable than the pressure decline meth- od in the low permeahility reserw)ir. The relation- ship between the mobility calculated from wireline test data and the I)ST productivity index was dis- cussed, and "the equivalent thickness productivity index" was proposed to reflect tile real productivi- ty, owing to considering the effect of impermeable interlayers when the productivity index was calcu- late& A statistical analysis of actual data has shown that there is a positive correlation between the mobility calculated from wireline test dala and "the equivalent thickness productivity index", and it may provide a new thinking line for predicting productivity by wireline formation test data.
关 键 词:电缆地层测试 低渗储层 流度计算 等效厚度采油指数 产能预测
分 类 号:TE353[石油与天然气工程—油气田开发工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222