检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:徐刘芬[1]
出 处:《农业经济与管理》2013年第1期24-28,41,共6页Agricultural Economics and Management
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目(08BJY038)
摘 要:刘易斯模型假定农村剩余劳动力转移方式是彻底的、不可逆的;转移主体是纯粹的经济人;转移过程中农业生产方式是不变的,这些假定都与我国现实不吻合,因此也不能够解释当前我国农村剩余劳动力仍然存在、农民工工资上涨和民工荒三者同时并存的特殊现象。新时期我国农村劳动力转移表现出具有可逆性,劳动力转移决策具有多因性,农业生产方式具有可变性等新特点。基于新时期我国农村劳动力转移的新特点,提出要提高城市化质量,促进农民工向市民身份转变,继续提高农业全要素生产率、实现产业梯度转移等对策。Lewis model assumes that the migration of rural surplus labor is thorough and irreversible; labors themselves are purely economic men, and the mode of agricultural production during the process keeps unchanged. But this assumption does not match with the current reality of rural labor migration in China. Therefore, it will lead to wrong conclusions, if we don't analyze carefully and simply apply the Lewis model to explain Chinese current rural labor migration and its impacts. The migration of rural labor in China is reversible, the motives for migration decision are complex and agricultural production is changeable. These are different with the Lewis model. Based on the new characteristics of rural labor migration, we put forward some suggestions, such as promoting human resource two-way flow, improving the total factor productivity of agriculture, and realizing the industry-transfer.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222