一种快速手消毒剂现场消毒效果观察  

OBSERVATION ON THE in vitro DISINFECTION EFFECT OF A RAPID HAND ANTISEPTIC

作　　者：李荷花[1] 王苗凤[1] 马玲平[1] 

机构地区：[1]浙江省台州医院,浙江临海317000

出　　处：《中国消毒学杂志》2013年第2期108-109,共2页Chinese Journal of Disinfection

摘　　要：目的观察一种快速手消毒剂的实际消毒效果。方法通过现场消毒试验方法,对该快速手消毒剂对外科手实际消毒效果进行了观察,同时与聚维酮碘作平行比较。结果两组各200人次分别使用快速手消毒剂和聚维酮碘消毒后,即刻、60、120、180 min等4个时段采样检测,全部无细菌生长。200人次使用某品牌快速手消毒剂消毒手部皮肤,无1例出现红斑、水肿和皮疹,有3例出现瘙痒,不良反应率为1.5%。200人次使用聚维酮碘消毒手部皮肤,不良反应率为6%。结论快速手消毒剂和聚维酮碘对医务人员外科手消毒效果无差别,消毒后均未培养出存活细菌,但快速手消毒剂消毒后皮肤速干性好,不良反应率低。Objective To observe the actual disinfection effect of a rapid hand antiseptic.Methods The in vitro disinfection test was used to compare the actual disinfection effect of this rapid hand antiseptic with povidone iodine.Results There was no bacteria detected in samples of four times（immediate,60min,120min,180min） from two groups whose hands exposed to the rapid hand antiseptic and povidone iodine respectively.There was no case of skin erythema or dropsy and rash while 3 cases of itching were found in the experiment group including 200 people exposed to this rapid hand disinfection antiseptic.The adverse reaction rate was 1.5%（3/200） in experiment group and that was 6% in control group（povidone iodine group）.Conclusion The disinfection effects of a rapid hand antiseptic and povidone iodine on hands of medical staff have no difference and there is no bacteria after disinfection.But there are quick dry skin and low adverse reaction rate after disinfection with a rapid hand antiseptic.

关 键 词：快速手消毒剂 聚维酮碘 外科手消毒 消毒效果 

分 类 号：R187.1[医药卫生—流行病学]