检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:苏力[1]
机构地区:[1]北京大学法学院,北京100871
出 处:《现代法学》2000年第3期9-13,共5页Modern Law Science
基 金:福特基金会资助的<中国农村基层司法制度研究>项目成果之一。
摘 要:基于时中国基层司法的调查和研究,本文试图概括地总结中国基层司法中经常运用的一些在现有的法律知识体制中末于以足够重视的知识和技术,并予以初步的理论分析。本文认为,由于中国基层法院法官所处的特定制度空间(初审法院)和时空位置(中国基层社会),他/她们所需要的知识和技巧不仅与理想型法官不同,而且与上诉审法官也不同。在这种余件下,中国基层法院法官实际上经常并非自党地创造和运用一些知识和技术。这种知识和技术有助于实用主义地解决一些实际问题,并且从现代的其他学科知识看来也具有一定的学理上的正当性,但是在有些情况下,也有可能被滥用。这种从司法实践来的知识,尽管来自基层,缺乏实践者的自我反思,但仍然具有实践意义和理论意义,需要当代中国关注现实的法学象的重视和研究。The author of the thesis beholds the view that in China judges at local levels being situated in positions characteristic of specific system interspaces, and space time (i. e. first trial court and grassroots social situation) require legal knowledge and techniques, which are not merely different from what judges of an ideal type need, hut also from judges in appellate courts do. Judges at local levels, therefore, may sometime, subconsciously create or apply some legal know - how and techniques which can matter-of-factly solve some practical problems, and which, from the standpoint of some other subjects, conceive some doctrinal justness. But the above - mentioned knowledge and techniques may in some ways be misapplied. However, they, being generated from grassroots levels though, and perhaps lack of self - criticism to some extent, are pregnant with significance both practically and theoretically and are deserving of the attention and research of the contemporary realistic legal scholars.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7