检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]安徽省淮北市妇幼保健院超声中心,安徽淮北235000
出 处:《安徽医药》2013年第2期290-292,共3页Anhui Medical and Pharmaceutical Journal
摘 要:目的系统评价国内经腹与经阴道超声对异位妊娠患者的诊断结果。方法运用Meta分析法对7项国内经腹与经阴道超声对异位妊娠患者进行诊断的临床随机对照试验结果进行综合分析。结果 7项研究有明显异质性(P<0.01),采用随机效应模型,Meta分析结果显示:阴道超声组诊断准确率优于腹部超声组(RR=1.12、95%CI为1.09~1.15),差异有显著性(P<0.01)。结论从诊断准确率角度分析,阴道超声优于腹部超声,但二者各具优势,必要时应联合进行。Objective To study transabdominal ultrasound and transvaginal ultrasound diagnostic results for patients with ectopic preg- nancy. Methods Meta-analysis was used to analyze the randomized controlled trials results of ectopic pregnancy diagnosed by seven do- mestic transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasound, respectively. Results There was obvious heterogeneity ( P 〈 0.01 ). With a random effects model, Meta analysis results showed that vaginal ultrasound diagnostic accuracy was better than abdominal ultrasound group( RR = 1.12,95% CI was 1.09 - 1.15 ). There were significant differences (P 〈 0.01 ). Conclusion Trans vaginal ultrasound is better than transabdominal ultrasound in diagnostic accuracy. But they should be used jointly when necessary.
分 类 号:R445.1[医药卫生—影像医学与核医学] R714.22[医药卫生—诊断学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28